Overs or Unders?

by **nads** 30th January 2009, 4:57 pm

What placement are you getting/have you got? Inlcude reasons to why you got that placement if you like Flash

by BlondeBarbie 30th January 2009, 5:15 pm

Unders, my ps said i had to have them as i had so little tissue xx

by **nads** 30th January 2009, 5:17 pm

I got partial unders, my ps said i didnt have a choice! lol i would've most definately got ripples and other complications if i got overs as i had no tissue, plus they would've looked like quite fake which i didnt want x

by BlondeBarbie 30th January 2009, 5:20 pm

I wasnt given a choice either my ps just said you'll need them under the muscle as theres so little tissue there. I presume mine are full unders he didnt say anything about partials i didnt know they existed before my op xx

by **nads** 30th January 2009, 5:24 pm

I guess it would be hard to tell without asking your ps but from the nipple down mine is over the muscle and feels much softer/squidgier than the top of the boob x

by BoobiePrize 30th January 2009, 6:36 pm

Partials for the natural look of the shape at the bottom of your boob, can't wait!! Plus I haven't got loads of tissue so need to have the muscle covering the implant

by **RoxyChick** 7th February 2009, 3:20 pm

I had overs, I didn't want the chance of distortion etc so for me this was the best option

xx

by amanda2k10 7th February 2009, 7:20 pm

apparently there is a legal recommendation for overs, i have just the right amount of tissue for overs,but ps said to reduce the risk of ripples and other complications i should have full unders.
hugs
amanda
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

by BoobiePrize 7th February 2009, 7:35 pm

My PS said he would only ever recommend overs with more than 2cm of breast tissue (all over the breast) this he measures with callipers. I have 2 point something (can't remember exactly) but decided unders would be the safest bet for me! I'd be distraught if my boobs looked anything but natural!! :pale:

by BlondeBarbie 7th February 2009, 9:06 pm

nads wrote:I guess it would be hard to tell without asking your ps but from the nipple down mine is over the muscle and feels much softer/squidgier than the top of the boob x

Ooh right, mine feel much softer/squishier under the nipple too. They feel full at the top but not as squishy, oh i dont know lol x

by **nads** 7th February 2009, 9:19 pm

Probably partials then hun x

by BlondeBarbie 7th February 2009, 9:57 pm

On second thoughts i just had a proper good prod/squeeze :lol: and they do feel soft & squishy all over so probs full unders after all lol! x

by **nads** 7th February 2009, 9:58 pm

Its hard to tell sometimes especially if you're muscles are relxed too but if i tense my pecs i can tell the difference between the top of the boob and the bottom cos it still stays squishy there whatever happens x

by loulou85 9th February 2009, 1:48 pm

I had overs.......I was a 32a/b but my surgeon said i had a good amount of tissue to have 260 or 300. I asked about Partials but he said overs were best for me.

by angelicfruitcake 9th February 2009, 2:11 pm

nads wrote:I guess it would be hard to tell without asking your ps but from the nipple down mine is over the muscle and feels much softer/squidgier than the top of the boob x

I had partials too and mine is completely opposite! How odd...I wonder if it's because I had anatomicals, so the top part has a higher percentage of natural boob!

by **nads** 9th February 2009, 2:15 pm

That is odd lol cos yours are still covered by your muscle up top but I keep hearing that anatomicals are firmer, idk if that true or not, due to a thicker shell xxx

by angelicfruitcake 9th February 2009, 3:26 pm

Yeah it's really weird...I would expect it to be the opposite. Mine are generally really soft now but feeling the top I think they feel completely natural...the bottom part I think not quite so much. Wasn't sure about the shell though!

by amanda2k10 9th February 2009, 3:51 pm

BoobiePrize wrote:My PS said he would only ever recommend overs with more than 2cm of breast tissue (all over the breast) this he measures with callipers. I have 2 point something (can't remember exactly) but decided unders would be the safest bet for me! I'd be distraught if my boobs looked anything but natural!! :pale:

me too hunni,
my ps said i have just over 2cm at the bottom and more than enough at the top, but to get a better result i should have full unders, i also want natural looking boobies
hugs
amanda
xxxxx

by **nads** 9th March 2009, 7:30 pm

by Angelpie 9th March 2009, 7:47 pm

All these bumped threads that were started when I was pre-op!

I had overs. I was surprised that my surgeon suggested overs, but I trusted him completely and am pleased with the result. They are one day away from being 3 weeks old and they are fairly squishy and I can push them together. I'll have to update my piccies again so I can have the opinions of my lovely BJS girlies.

Angel x

by **nads** 9th March 2009, 7:50 pm

Angelpie wrote:All these bumped threads that were started when I was pre-op!

Thought i would as theres alot of new girlies too xxx

by moonmar 9th March 2009, 8:03 pm

I was going to get overs but when I woke up from the op my ps said he used a little muscle at the top to cover the edge of the implant as it was coming out too rounded, so in the end I got partials but it's under only in a small area. What is subfascial? if it means that the implant is under the skin of the muscle (not under the muscle nor directly under the mammary gland), I think a lot of surgeons do that anyway (mine certainly does) but they tend to still call them "overs".

by **ShootingStar** 9th March 2009, 8:13 pm

I am the odd one out here girls...

Mine are completely different to all yours..

Mine are....... "over & out" boobs Hysterical

in other words 1 is an over and 1 is out! :lol:

xx

by **nads** 9th March 2009, 8:14 pm

Subfascial is when the fibrous fascia tissue is dissected away from the front wall of the pec and the implant placed beneath this fascia layer. Its more of a tissue than a muscle i guess x

by moonmar 9th March 2009, 8:20 pm

Yes, I think that's what my ps refers to as "skin of the muscle". He says that even when he doesn't place the implant under the muscle he always places is under that fascia. But he still called them "overs" in that case - I have to say that I have always spoken in Italian to my PS so maybe that's where the confusion arises.
However, I remember going to a consult with Barbara Lutz of Transform and she also suggested I have overs, but said that she always places "overs" under the "muscle skin" too... so maybe it's a common thing. Confusing....

by Sponsored content

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Overs or Unders?

Overs or Unders

Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?

Re: Overs or Unders?