Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Having panicks about ultra high profiles · by csjones 9th May 2009, 7:02 pm

Hi Girls

Got BA booked with Singh on 23rd of May at Highgate. All paid for!!

But having a dilemma about sizes and profiles. I tried 415cc and 495cc during my consultation and preffered the bigger one under clothes. I told him that I wanted natural looking boobs but with a good cleavege. I am currently a 36empty c and he said that I should go up to 36dd. I have decided to go for 455cc the size in between.

I have recently discovered that he is using Sebbin ultra high profiles: 118mm width ad 6.0 projection. Panicking that they're going to be too high/big!! Thought I was having high profiles not ultra high. I understand that ultra high profiles are often used for smaller framed women. I am quite broad so very confused....

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thannks
Tina

by natalia 9th May 2009, 8:12 pm

mr.singhs a really great surgeon i would trust his judgement he likes to use high profile simply because they give more projection they stick out i had him he is amazing but he does like big implants fake really dont look as big as real boobs i doubt their be to high they will just give off more projection i wanted mods to begin with but he told me to have high and mine really stick out so glad i listened to him
xx

by **nads** 9th May 2009, 8:13 pm

Do you know your BWD (breast width) so you know how they fit? 11.8 is quite a narrow implant for someone with a 36 band size, for example im a 32 back and 10.5 breast width and my implants are 11.5 wide and fit me perfect. You should try and match the implant width to your breast width for a good look x

by csjones 10th May 2009, 8:09 pm

My breast width is roughly 13. Went to Marks today to get measured. She said I was 34inch below boobs and 38 aboce. Said that I was in between 34 and 36. I could either have a 36c bra or 34d..

If my BDW is 13 and I'am having 455cc 118Width wpuld these be too narrow do you reckon??? Really confused!! Or shoud I go for 495cc with a width of 122. This is waht I originally decided at my consultation!!

by **nads** 10th May 2009, 8:10 pm

I would try and match your bwd as close as possible to avoid the narrow implant look hun, maybe go for less projection more width?

by **RoxyChick** 10th May 2009, 8:24 pm

I think having an implant that will cover your chest will look more natural than one that's too narrow. Otherwise you'll get the canyon in the middle!

If you specifically stated to your surgeon you want cleavage he'd have given you the right sizes to go by. If you're worried about projection ask why he hasn't given you mod or low profiles.
xx

by georgie88 10th May 2009, 8:34 pm

Hi,

I'm having similar problems, though will be going for a much smaller implant and i'll be having anatomicals. the 225g i've been offered are extra full projection (5.1cm) which sounds alot to me as i've got quite a small frame. The next size down with the same bwd and height are 195g full projection (4.2cm), the difference of 0.9cm between the two doesn't sound alot but i'm worried it will make quite a visible difference, though my ps has assured me that either will look very natural. Try to go for what you felt most comfortable trying on at the consult, 6.0 projection isn't that much more than the 5.1 that i could have so i doubt they would look too unnatural even if you did go for the uhp x x

by MsTeews 11th May 2009, 9:25 am

If you like the hourglass side cleavage I'd go for moderate profile ones as they're wider and fill up your chest more, it depends what look you want xx

by moonmar 11th May 2009, 9:43 am

I think if you are worried the best course of action is seeing your surgeon again before the op and have all your doubts clarified... or if that's not possible, I'm sure you can at least talk to him on the phone! We can give suggestions and opinions but at the end of the day he is the expert and Mr Singh has a good reputation so I am sure he will put your mind at rest.

by Sponsored content

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles

Re: Having panicks about ultra high profiles