Profiles, high low mods

Hope this explains them a bit more, as you can see in the picture low profiles are very wide but are quite flat so offer very little projection, but the mods offer more projection with a bit less width and the high profile offer more projection again but with less width,

here is a picture of 350cc implants one is high profile the other is mod



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The moderate profile implant has a wider base when viewed from the top. The high profile implant has a smaller base. When viewed from the side, the high profile implant is taller (more projection). The moderate profile implant will appear distributed over a larger area on the chest wall, but will project less. There will be a smoother transition between the upper chest wall and the volume of the implant. The high profile implant will have a more noticeable transition between chest wall and implant, and it will project more. Neither implant is “better”. What is critical is educating the patient about how each type of implant affects the “look” she is trying to get.

For example, take a woman with a narrow chest wall. If she thinks she looks too small on top compared to he hips, she may want to consider a moderate profile implant which is wider and will restore some balance with her lower body. If, on the other hand, she wants a large cup size, but not necessarily a wide appearance on her torso, she is better of with a high profile implant.A woman with a wide chest wall will be better off with a moderate profile implant, and if she wants more projection, go for a larger moderate profile implant. The danger of picking high profile implants with their narrower base is that they may look too obviously “artificial”. This is less of a danger if the patient already has sufficient breast tissue thickness to wrap around and disguise the implant.

These guidelines are not absolute, as some patients do like a very pronounced cleavage, in which a high profile implant is more likely to create the desired effect. On the other hand, if a patient just wants to “fill out” the volume lost as a result of age or pregnancies, I’m more likely to recommend moderate profile implants.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Can't believe how big the difference is between the picture off the high and mod profiles! Thank you for that xx

I'm having naturell implants , think that's how iu spell it , lol but when I asked her about profile she said thay only cone in 1 profile is that true?

Great post misf1. Thanks.

ok my last post come out wrong i ment to say when i asked my pcc NOT her lol

Trisha, Natrelle range comes in low, moderate, high and extra high profiles. Your pcc sounds a little confused.

i thought so to im going to pay tomorrow so i will ask again x

The 2nd picture in my post is of the naturelle profiles (for rounds).

Great info, cheers Misf

Interesting thanks misf1. Is it me or is there's a touch of the UFOs about them when they're parked on sand? .

x

Sue Scrivs wrote:Interesting thanks misf1. Is it me or is there's a touch of the UFOs about them when they're parked on sand? .

x

just curious are any of these considered anatomics? I haven't heard of them here in the U.S. are anatomics like the HP or....

sorry I think someone a while back educated me on this but can't think of it just now

I remember your previous post. Anatomicals are tear drop shaped. All those above are round.

Well I've been and paid in full and ask my pcc again about the profile of my implants she looked in my notes and said my surgeon had choosen TRX profile so I misunderstood her at my consultation oops silly moi lol so I'm officially getting bigger boobs in 19days YAAAY!!!!

ahh! roxanne yes ur the one that had educated me on that I remember now!! thnak u doll!!

Here are some anatomical implants





and the form stable (gummi brear) gel